Prove the model follows the brief.

We audit Revit files against documented requirements and report the gaps by delivery risk. Compliance becomes a traceable check, not a visual opinion.

A coordinated model can still fail its delivery requirements.

A Revit compliance check tests model structure, naming, parameters, content and outputs against the BIM execution plan, office standard or client information requirements. It asks whether the file is organised and populated for its intended exchange, review and submission.

Non-compliance often stays hidden until a milestone. Missing shared parameters break schedules, inconsistent classification weakens exports, and uncontrolled names make model packages difficult to validate across disciplines.

CNE converts written requirements into a structured audit. We distinguish mandatory failures from improvement items and give BIM managers a prioritised action list tied to model elements, views or settings.

Requirements tested against the live model

01
BEP and standards matrix

Applicable requirements are mapped to specific checks, evidence sources and acceptance criteria before the model is reviewed.

02
Naming and structure audit

Files, levels, grids, views, sheets, families, types and worksets are checked against the agreed convention.

03
Parameter and data review

Shared parameters, classifications, required values and schedule behaviour are tested for presence, consistency and usability.

04
Content and model practice check

Families, in-place elements, warnings, links and view controls are reviewed against office or project modelling rules.

05
Export readiness review

IFC mappings, categories, coordinates and required datasets are checked for applicable CORENET X and IFC-SG workflows.

06
Prioritised gap report

Findings are ranked by submission, coordination and production impact, with evidence and a recommended corrective action.

Autodesk RevitDynamoIFCIFC-SGCORENET X

A gap report built for action

Checks follow written requirements

We trace findings to the BEP or governing standard instead of imposing undocumented preferences on the team.

Severity reflects delivery impact

Submission blockers and data failures are separated from housekeeping items that can wait.

Evidence accompanies every finding

Model locations, examples and affected rules give BIM managers enough context to assign and verify corrections.

Find the gaps before the delivery review does.

Send us the Revit model, BEP and applicable standards. CNE will return a clear compliance position and a prioritised route to correction.